Kodak Carousel 4600 Instruction Manual' title='Kodak Carousel 4600 Instruction Manual' />Express Helpline Get answer of your question fast from real experts. Some 700 links to photographiy equipment DIY work Repair, modification and construction. Collectible photographic materials, including worlds largest assortment of instruction manuals. Texas Rep. Lamar Smith, the Republican official in charge of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee, has now penned an editorial urging the public not to. The Guy Who Invented Those Annoying Password Rules Now Regrets Wasting Your Time. Weve all been forced to do it create a password with at least so many characters, so many numbers, so many special characters, and maybe an uppercase letter. Guess what The guy who invented these standards nearly 1. He is also very sorry. The man in question is Bill Burr, a former manager at the National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST. In 2. 00. 3, Burr drafted an eight page guide on how to create secure passwords creatively called the NIST Special Publication 8. Appendix A. This became the document that would go on to more or less dictate password requirements on everything from email accounts to login pages to your online banking portal. PREVIEWS/45612216/23432455/projector/kodak/kodak_carousel_4200_4400_4600_5600_parts_list.pdf_1.png' alt='Kodak Carousel 4600 Instruction Manual' title='Kodak Carousel 4600 Instruction Manual' />View and Download Kodak Carousel 760 service manual online. Carousel 760 Projector pdf manual download. Download the free trial version below to get started. Doubleclick the downloaded file to install the software. Issuu is a digital publishing platform that makes it simple to publish magazines, catalogs, newspapers, books, and more online. Easily share your publications and get. Kodak Carousel 4600 Instruction Manual' title='Kodak Carousel 4600 Instruction Manual' />All those rules about using uppercase letters and special characters and numbersthose are all because of Bill. The only problem is that Bill Burr didnt really know much about how passwords worked back in 2. He certainly wasnt a security expert. And now the retired 7. Much of what I did I now regret, Bill Burr told. The Wall Street Journal recently, admitting that his research into passwords mostly came from a white paper written in the 1. In the end, the list of guidelines was probably too complicated for a lot of folks to understand very well, and the truth is, it was barking up the wrong tree. Bill is not wrong. Simple math shows that a shorter password with wacky characters is much easier to crack than a long string of easy to remember words. This classic XKCD comic shows how four simple words create a passphrase that would take a computer 5. This is why the latest set of NIST guidelines recommends that people create long passphrases rather than gobbledygook words like the ones Bill thought were secure. Pro tip Use this guide to create a super secure passcode using a pair of dice. Inevitably, you have to wonder if Bill not only feels regretful but also a little embarrassed. Its not entirely his fault either. Fifteen years ago, there was very little research into passwords and information security, while researchers can now draw on millions upon millions of examples. Bill also wasnt the only one to come up with some regrettable ideas in the early days of the web, either. Remember pop ads, the scourge of the mid aughts internetThe inventor of those is super sorry as well. Oh, and the confusing, unnecessary double slash in web addresses The inventor of that idea and the web itself Tim Berners Lee is also sorry. Technology is often an exercise of trial and error. If you get something right, like Jeff Bezos or Mark Zuckerberg have done, the rewards are sweet. If you screw up and waste years of unsuspecting internet users time in the process, like Bill did, you get to apologize years later. We forgive you, Bill. At least some of us do. Wall Street Journal. The Republican in Charge of the House Science Committee Is Now Arguing Global Warming Has BenefitsTexas Rep. Lamar Smith, the Republican official in charge of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee, has now penned an editorial urging the public not to buy into hysteria over carbon dioxide, which he believes could actually be good for us. The post, which can be viewed over at the fossil fuel industry backed Heritage Foundations Daily Signal blog, is full of highly misleading or downright nonsensical arguments about how mankinds decision to burn as much of the fossil fuel the Earth has accumulated in the past billion years as fast as possible could have benefits that are often ignored and under researched. Smith, it seems, has clued in to the fact that one of the things plants require to create energy is carbon dioxide, the greenhouse gas most responsible for humanitys impact on the climate to date. Because plants love CO2 so much, Smith argued, pumping lots of it into the atmosphere could result in greater volume of food production and better quality food, as well as lush vegetation in formerly desolate areas of the globe. Smith has literally entered Natural News territory. Top VIdeos. Warning Invalid argument supplied for foreach in srvusersserverpilotappsjujaitalypublicindex. These claims are just bunk, scientifically, seeing as peer reviewed studies suggest any increase in agricultural production from more CO2 in the atmosphere will likely be more than offset by losses from more extreme temperatures and droughts. Any benefits that could be derived would similarly be inconsistent and probably canceled out as the globe continued to warm. More plants is not necessarily a good thing, because some of them are crop destroying weeds, and others could disrupt existing ecosystems. Bonus points Smith, who again is the Houses top science legislator, has no idea what the difference between a controlled environment and everywhere else is. In fact, atmospheric carbon dioxide is so important for plant health that greenhouses often use a carbon dioxide generator to increase production, Smith wrote. This is a little like saying fires keep people warm, so you should set your house on fire. Also, as the Earth warms, we are seeing beneficial changes to the earths geography, Smith added, noting Arctic sea ice is decreasing. While scientists would have you believe disappearing ice in the northern hemisphere could contribute to devastating sea level rise that would flood coastal cities, Smith is just pleased as punch it could result in commercial shipping lanes that provide faster, more convenient, and less costly routes between ports in Asia, Europe, and eastern North America. Look, new sea lanes are good and all, but a pretty small consolation prize given that rising sea levels are already screwing up existing ones with icebergs and canal disruptions and, if humans burn all the fossil fuels on the planet, may potentially cause an apocalyptic event. Microsoft Office 2010 Starter Edition on this page. The only problem is that Bill Burr didnt really know much about how passwords worked back in 2003, when he wrote the manual. He certainly wasnt a security expert. The rest of Smiths post has nothing to do with the benefits of a warming climate per se, but touting how the use of fossil fuels and the byproducts of carbon enrichment has improved everyones lives. While thats perhaps true, the long term consequences of continuing to do so are a completely different issue. Arguments such as these have long been de rigueur within the small community of industry friendly climate scientists and the energy industrys much larger army of lobbyists, but they are little more than speculative what ifs. Theyre not backed by the sciencebut because it has become completely untenable to deny climate change is happening at all while the Earth is roasting, Republicans opposed to doing anything about it have to come up with something. Also, it might help one of Smiths biggest campaign contributors is the oil and gas sector, which has given him 7. Open. Secrets. It is clear that Lamar Smith has progressed and is slowly advancing through the stages of denial, prolific Penn State climatologist Michael E. Mann, author of climate change denial guidebook The Madhouse Effect, told Gizmodo via email. Mann added Smith has apparently now moved from its not happening, to okits happening, but IT WILL BE GOOD FOR US One step at a time I suppose, but at least there is some apparent progress toward the truth that climate change is real, human caused, and already a problem. Daily SignalUpdate This post has been updated to clarify that while the overall trend of melting ice, including Arctic land ice, is contributing to sea level rise, the loss of Arctic sea ice only indirectly contributes to it.